FacilityLane vs IBM Maximo
Looking for a Maximo alternative? See how FacilityLane compares on features, pricing, and support.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | FacilityLane | Maximo |
|---|---|---|
| AI-Powered Insights | ||
| Predictive Maintenance | ||
| Work Order Management | ||
| Asset Management | ||
| Native Mobile App | ||
| Quick Implementation | ||
| Transparent Pricing | ||
| No IT Team Required | ||
| Easy Configuration | ||
| Small Team Friendly |
Why Teams Switch to FacilityLane
Maintenance teams choose FacilityLane over Maximo for these key reasons:
Rapid Implementation
FacilityLane deploys in days, not months. Maximo implementations often take 6-12 months and require dedicated consultants.
Predictable Pricing
Simple per-user pricing with no surprise costs. Maximo licensing, implementation, and maintenance fees can exceed budget by 3-5x.
Zero Complexity
Start using FacilityLane immediately with intuitive configuration. Maximo requires specialized administrators and extensive customization.
Modern Mobile Experience
Native apps with offline support out of the box. Maximo mobile capabilities require additional modules and configuration.
AI Without Complexity
AI features work automatically—no data science team needed. Maximo's AI requires significant setup and specialized expertise.
Direct Support Access
Talk to real humans who know your setup. Maximo support often involves lengthy escalation processes and partner involvement.
Common Questions About Switching
Everything you need to know about moving from Maximo to FacilityLane.
FacilityLane is designed for rapid deployment and ease of use. While Maximo is powerful, it requires extensive implementation, dedicated administrators, and significant ongoing investment. FacilityLane delivers enterprise-grade features with consumer-grade simplicity.
Ready to Make the Switch?
Join teams who've simplified from Maximo to FacilityLane. We'll handle the migration.